News

Archive for the 'Training' Category

Coxmate launches coxless boat unit, the Coxmate HC

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

The Coxmate HC is our latest innovation and is designed specifically for coxless boats.
Lighter and compact, it mounts into your boat on a wiring loom that includes a neat on/off foot-switch as well as magnetic pick-ups for rating and the speed impeller.

Designed to fit the NK loom. Its software is the same as the Coxmate SCT so you can double up if you own it already.
We also sell the micro-impellers separately, and they work with NK although you’ll need to recalibrate because it spins faster than the NK one).

HC    HC impeller compared to NK   

Coxmate HC for coxless boats;         Coxmate Micro Impeller compared to NK impeller

Features Include:-

  • Configurable display with following variables: rating, speed, time, distance, av. speed, distance, stroke count, dist/stroke, heart rate & ratio (min/max speed per stroke)
  • Integral pick up for Polar Heart Rate monitors
  • Takes AAA batteries: approx 1.5 years runtime without backlight or approx 100 hours runtime with backlight
  • Substantial memory for storing data
  • Real time clock for time/date stamping rowing records.
  • Ability to display data concurrently on two HC units
  • Mounting bracket compatible with NK Speedcoach®
  • Includes auxiliary switch input, which can be used to start, stop and reset timer. Mountable for foot or leg operation
  • HC micro impeller dramatically reduces drag and susceptibility to damage and weed contamination
  • Optional PC link and analysis software is available

As ever, we have demo units available for you to try out. Please ask.

Nature or Nurture?

Friday, August 1st, 2008

Duncan Holland writes;

 

I watched a BBC programme last night, ‘Colin Jackson, the
making of me
’.  (As an aside the BBC is
one part of Britain
I am going to miss.)  The programme
addressed the old nature versus nurture debate in the context of Jackson . 
It didn’t do what the trailers promised, answer the question, but it
raised some good debating points.

 

The real answer of course is that to be a world class
athlete both sides are needed, great genes and great support.  This is where I start getting
interested.  Jackson was fortunate in
having supportive parents and a superb coach just down the road who was
prepared to invest time and energy into a kid with not much apparent talent,
and who saw sooner than others that Jackson had something special.

 

Rowing in most countries is haphazard in its search for talent;
GBR is an exception here with the World Class Start programme.  There is though, the informal network of
clubs.  Most clubs have a few big young
rowers who are considered to be talented. 
What I am interested in is the conversion this talent to
performance.  In the old days before the
advent of National Training Centres and HPC ’s and RPC ’s and professional
coaches these talented youngsters were bred up in the clubs and educated in the
way of the sport by rowing with, and mixing with, the older, faster rowers in
the club.  Now with most of the top
rowers spending their time as professionals hidden away at the National Centre
the young athletes miss role models and leadership in the clubs.

 

This sets the rest of us a challenge; we need to help those
talented rowers who aren’t identified early to blossom.  I believe the best way to do this is to keep
them in a group.  It isn’t necessary to
isolate talent.  Rowing in a crew boat,
even if most of the crew have less talent, is a good way for a potential star
to develop.  Don’t forget that a top
rower needs social skills as well as physical ones.  A good apprenticeship in club crews, and at
local regattas, can prepare an athlete to make the jump to top sport.

 

And finally, Jackson
told us he was proud of his genetic make up, his rare and special mix of muscle
fibre types.  I would suggest he should
be proud of what he did with his inheritance. 
Lots of people inherit a great body, few become World Champion!

 

Duncan

Do Mars and Venus Row Differently?

Tuesday, July 15th, 2008

Of late I have been coaching various crews in Cambridge UK, the Robinson College 1st Women’s boat and some crews from Champion of the Thames, and have been coaching women for the first time for a number of years.  All the crews have been preparing themselves for The Bumps
Apart from being great fun this experience has re-confirmed a belief I formed many years ago.  Men and women are different!  So what?

I often get asked questions along the lines of ‘What differences should there be in the training programme for men and women?’  I don’t think there should be a significant difference.  I believe men and women can, and should, row the same way, train the same way; do the same amount of work.


Where I see the difference is in the attitudes displayed.  These are merely generalisations, but like all good generalisations, have a grain of truth in them.  If a men’s boat isn’t going well the first reaction from most of the crew is ‘The others are messing it up for me’.  Women react with the polar opposite ‘Sorry, I am messing it up for you’.  

The interesting question for me is how I should react, and yes I know my views are filtered through my attitudes and experiences, and are therefore not truly objective, coaching is a subjective business.  

What are your experiences and suggestions?


Duncan

Mark Edgar – Physiotherapist on Developments in Core Stability

Sunday, January 27th, 2008

In rowing everyone is a different size and shape and the skill of coaching is to manipulate those people so they can all row together and make the boat go forward faster.
Differences in anatomy gives challenges – success doesn’t come without problems.  Milan 2003 W2- both athletes had major disc problems (Grainger and Bishop).  Flexibility and core stability tries to address these problems.


Pathology
-    Disc prolapse – 10 years ago there were lots of them e.g. Tim Foster (got operated on) and made a full recovery and competed again - others didn’t come back.  A disc is a small thing.  Rowers load the back at the point inside the belt line where your trousers go – low lumbar spine.
-    Muscles that support the lumbar spine – transverse abdominus (pilates people like this a lot) Strength here can give the internal spine some resilience. In-boat posture is important as well as having core strength.  
-    Lower back pain and stiffness
-    Functional instability Carry your good form from the gym / ergo into the boat.  Use the right words and descriptions.  Harry Mahon had 8 different commands for the same action for the 8 different men in the Sydney crew.  He was not inhibited by words.  Each understood in a slightly different way.
-    Rib stress fractures – symptoms are it is sore to row, coughing is sore, rolling over in bed is sore.  Generally 3 weeks on cross training and introduce slowly back…. last introduction is bench pull and bench press.
-    Shoulder pain – look at athletes and don’t forget the thoracic area…shoulders going up or down and check what’s happening in the ribs this affects the shoulders.  
 
Core stability
-    Improved force output – we teach athletes to load
-    Increased neuro-muscular efficiency
-    Decreased incidence of overuse injuries – conjecture and hope!  Better core stability means you can load up better and if you can do that you should be able to go faster in the boat.
-    Provides a solid base around which all athletic movement occurs
-    Improves the aesthetics – really strong people often look like they are rowing well.  Use images of this to improve others
Cylinder of support – transverse abdominus, diaphragm, multifidus, pelvic floor.


Relevance to rowing
-    strength training
-    posture: rock over position (dependent on hamstring length)
-    leverage: longer levers = greater force
-    injury prevention


Step up from core stability - Ensure the loading you are developing isn’t compromised by the following session e.g. core one day and heavy weights the next.  Check the loading mechanism is engaging properly.


Experiment with athletes you work with  - assessment techniques for core is as important as doing it.  Progress from gym to rowing machine to water.  Check they can engage properly before moving to the next stage. Watch closely as baggy clothing conceals what’s going on muscularly
Don’t be afraid of speaking to other coaches I your club if you spot poor posture in their athletes.
Stretching – him flexors, ITB, glutes / piriformis, hamstrings, lower back – flexion/extension/rotation
Very important for young people.  They have to be flexible enough to get into the positions you ask for.  Hamstrings match the quads – as you train one, do the other too.

Questions

Big blades for juniors?  When they first came out the big blades were on long shafts and combined with a time when long ergos also were introduced and both contributed to injury.  Watch for failures in the kinetic chain and posture and then decide whether big blades or weights or ergos is causing the bad habit / poor posture. The key is the athlete can’t do the movement  

Do coxes need core stability?  Coxswains can reinforce the coaching and a good cox can feel changes in the boat sometimes quicker than the coach can spot it.  Front loaders sometimes give back and neck problems.  Make sure feet have something to butt up against - polystyrene.  Padding around the back of the neck.  Stop and stand up and stretch during the outing. Coxswains core stability is important.  Remember they try to diet at the same time and can get unhealthy.  Rowley Douglas was integral to the Sydney 8 and he did all the core training with the crew and was a very important part of that unit.

New ROWHOW website

Sunday, January 27th, 2008

Rich Stock, OARA Club and Coach Resources office

New distance learning system

In-house system www.rowhow.org RowHow
News on front page… latest resources for coaches, and a calendar
More interactive content and fewer “pdf for downloads”
Easier layout and navigate
Same login details as main ARA site (just tried it and my login doesn't work… I probably forgot it!) 

Content will include

  • more coaching L2 and L3
  • coxing - new introductory certificate in development
  • Child protection qualifications & updates
  • water safety
  • beginner skills / teach yourslef rowing
  • trailer driving

Hazard awareness for coxes (like the UK driving test)  what to wear - dress a paper doll!, computer game avoiding other boats, bingo identifying boat types, dominoes matching boat type

Day 2, ARA Coaching Conference - Chris Shambrook: Intelligence for Coaching

Sunday, January 27th, 2008


Chris Shambrook: Intelligence for Coaching

 Discuss the most rewarding coaching experience you ever had round the table.  What did you feel like?
Emotional intelligence for coaching rowing
First test
-    Write down 4/5 words about the athletes who are easiest to coach
-    Alongside write down 4/5 words about how you feel when coaching them
Chicken or Egg?  What comes first – the great athlete or is it how you are thinking / feeling leading their response to your lead.
Discuss (now do the reverse for negative feelings)
We felt you have to ‘act’ and always be positive, but when you get nothing back from the athletes it is draining emotionally.
There is resource you have available to you influences the performance of the crew.
Performance = potential minus interference which prevents performance
-    Coaching performance
-    Individual athlete performance
-    Crew performance
Quote from Jurgen Grobler “We often ask is it the athlete? Or is it the coach.  Well that is a challenge, a bit motivation for me.”
Chris described this a ‘healthy’ paranoia…..!



Boat speed

-    Physical, technical, biomechanical, tactical options.  If we have exhausted improved boat speed via these means
-    Then focus on EI (Emotional Intelligence) by getting athletes more consistently in tune to how they are thinking and how it makes them feel is there an advantage to be gained here?
-    Will EI unlock more potential with the core elements?
-    Value of explicit EI work versus implicit consideration through good coaching



Stephen Covey mantras

“seek first to understand and then be understood”
-    We need to be world class in our ability to do this.
-    What’s it like to be in the receiver mode when you are asking an athlete, why don’t you understand what I am saying?
“we tend to judge ourselves by our intentions and others by their behaviours”
-    Many athletes seem to have the intention of doing stuff wrong because their behaviour is showing mistakes.  Clearly this isn’t true all the time.
-    Can you be confident that the athletes’ behaviours are matched up with their intentions?
-    Is your communication as positive and helpful as possible and are you receiving back in a positive way and recognise what you get back in order to then be positive back again to the athlete?
-    Both of these result in the asking of different questions and a changing of perspective.
-    Sometimes being autocratic in coaching is exactly the right thing to do

If you don’t keep control of thoughts and emotions at key points in a game / match difficult things can happen – computer rage, players fighting.  A dis-connect between thought and emotion.
Most of the time EI is probably working very well because you don’t see the negative things coming out.
Good examples of many people interacting at the same time and keeping focus e.g. open heart surgery, F1 pit crew (24 people for 10 seconds round a car), rowing coaches monitor many things at one time (water conditions, how others are moving, stopwatch, megaphone, drive a launch – multi tasking).


You’re contagious
Attitudes are contagious – is yours worth catching?  Use this when selecting athletes and how they will perform in the changing room, in training, during a match.  When you spend time with people you tend to share moods – within 2 hours.  Research in work meetings proved this.
People who are more committed to the team are likely to link moods more readily.
Task 2: Think about your club / squad.  Which person is most likely to set the mood? Where does the emotional lead come from?


Coaches tend to set the tone

-    Emotional spread is often done by leaders – because they talk more, but people listen to people with authority and has more chance to influence
-    Leaders tend to comment first on matters and subsequent comments build on that first comment
-    The leader’s interpretation of a situation provides the reference point for the group so appropriate emotional reaction is a function of the message sent out by the leader.
-    Where are the opportunities when you can choose to spread a positive / negative mood?  Team debrief after an outing, before a race briefing


Positive emotions = better performance. 
Feel more relaxed / confident, relaxed.  Increased mental efficiency, flexibility of thought, mopre likely to break a movement pattern if they feel positive.  If not feeling like that they revert to safety their traditional way of moving.
Upbeat moods increase the positive view of others – tends to make better connection for teamwork.
Increased optimism of success leads to increases creativity and decision making and helpfulness within the crew.
The ability of a leader to pitch a group into an enthusiastic, cooperative mood can determine success.
 

4 quadrants of EI
-    Self awareness – this has to be high – your mental and physical state.  What about your personality and how it interacts with other people.  Are you conscious of your fatigue, concentration levels physically as well.  Remember to look after yourself as well as your athletes
-    Self regulation – can I make choices to change me from how I am now to where I need to be.  How good am I to shift a mood or a thought process to a different one?  How good am I to get phycisal rest and recovery?  Coaching sharpness this is really challenging when your body is tired and your brain needs to pick up on this.
-    Awareness of others – pick up on them once you’ve sorted yourself!  How good are you at others’ physical state, mental state.  Vital.
-    Management of others – how good are you at putting things in place that allows them to shift and move to the most appropriate state for functioning now.


Task 3
Think of each EI quadrant as 100% score possibilities.  What is your current profile in each of the 4 segments?  Consider the right side and the left side of the grid.

How am I?

How are they?

How do I need to be

How do they need to be?

You are doing this technically all the time with athletes
technically.  Now add in the EI side to
include emotion and thought.  Will this
help you as a coach?  Making a conscious
choice to bring this into your coaching will that make it more effective.  If you do it implicitly you could probably
improve from unconscious competence to conscious competence.

Ask the question, do I need to change how the athletes are
in order to change what they are doing?

Be alert to what is interfering with the communication
process. May be worth taking off the water for a discussion rather than trying
to solve it during an outing.

Most of sports psychology is about getting athletes to
choose their thoughts and feelings in order to deliver success.  Can you do this systematically (visualisation,
arousal levels, pep talk, pre-race plan) and can you do it consistently?

The challenge

-         
There is the here and now version of the grid.  What’s happening now?

-         
Then what happens in preparation – project ahead
to a situation you are going into.  How
am I typically and how do I need to be in this situation – and for the crew.

-         
Make proactive decisions about how you and they
need to feel and then do everything possible to ensure that you deliver on
those behavioural / attitudinal goals. 
Practise!

-         
Set and evaluation thinking and behavioural
goals


The Self Management Recipe

-    Mood management – how strongly can you rate yourself, recognise and change it or accentuate if required
-    Self-motivation – regular conversations with yourself to keep you motivated, focused. How easy do you find that.  How much time do you invest in this? Regularity?
-    Using intuition – a coaching skill you should pay attention to regularly.  Do you suppress it?
-    Dealing with setbacks – how good is your self-management on this? This is a skill you will be faced with on a regular basis.  If prepared, you can take positive steps on from a setback.  You know how to deal with them.  Visualise the situation.  Sets a good example to athletes
-    Managing energy and peaking for a performance – for yourself.  When is peak moment, how effectively do you have all the resources ready for that moment? When an important week comes up, look at the week prior to ensure you go into the big week as prepared as possible
-    Switching on and off – when you leave the boathouse, can you leave it there and not think about it. 
Identify your strengths and play to them as often as possible.  Practice your key mental skills. 
Concentration - attending to the right thing at the right time.  What are the key things at this time?  Managing energy enables better concentration management.

Management of relationships
-    Motivating others (or not demotivating them) Most people turn up with all the motivation they are going to have and leaders tend to reduce that level of motivation! Can you give a pep talk?
-    Leading others – giving them a view of where you are going, the map of the journey.  What is your style of leading?
-    Coaching others – most of your time is spent doing technique, can you add in other umbrella concepts as well
-    Collaboration – how good are you at this?
-    Confrontation? 
-    Facilitation relationships between others – allowing each athlete to be aware of the strengths of others, how to get the most out of them when in crew boats together,

Getting on the same page… if all this works
Being emotionally intelligent involves
-    Noticing feelings
-    Paying attention to them
-    Recognising their importance
-    Using your thoughts about them to make decisions about how to respond
This applies to your own feelings and those of others.

Crew EI
-    A crew may react differently e.g. stroke may be very self involved and not aware of what’s going on around
-    Bow may be very focused on everyone else but not very focused on themselves
-    2 – may be focused on the thoughts and feelings of the coach rather than themselves
-    3 – may be good at focusing both on themselves and the crew as a whole
-    As a coach you have to consider both the individuals and the whole crew…. what is the style of each athlete…..
-    Athletes who are good at noticing feelings are often also good at kinaesthetic awareness (how their body is moving)

What EI rates – “self”
Definitions  on sheet in pack…. give yourself a score rate 1-10
-    Emotional resilience – maintaining positive
-    Personal power – the degree that you believe you are in charge of and take responsibility for the things in your life rather than seeing yourself as a victim of circumstance
-    Goal directedness – important as a coach.  The degree to which your behaviour is related to your own long term goals.
-    Flexibility – how good are you at being blocked off and coming up with new ways to overcome, flexible thinking
-    Personal openness and connectedness – how readily people see you as approachable and how effective people see you are in terms of making relationships.
-    Invitation to trust – how trustworthy are you. Do you act congruently with your aims and goals.  If you say you will do something do you do it regularly?

What EI rates – “others”
There is a ‘sweet spot’ with just enough and not too much or too little of all of these.
-    Trust – you can be too trusting (mistrustful, carefully trusting, over trusting) do you trust athletes to do things on their own.
-    Balanced outlook (pessimistic, realistically optimistic, over optimistic) when preparing a crew… what would your athletes say about you
-    Emotional expression and control (under controlled, free and in charge, over controlled) is emotion something that happens to you (are you Dr Spock and over controlled)
-    Conflict handling (passive, assertive, aggressive) What is your style?
-    Interdependence (dependent, interdependent, independent) What is the balance of working with others, do you let others work with you?

Specific needs for coaching
Pre race pep talk – how are you typically and how do you need to be to give the best send-off? How are the athletes and how do you need them to be?
Post race debrief after a defeat – how are you typically and how do you need to be?  What is the challenge in an emotional sense for you?
Post race debrief after a surprise victory – to build on this.  Typical reaction versus ideal.

 
Question

How do you stop people talking themselves down?  Come up with two different sets of recipes – how do you become the world’s worst rower and what would you say to yourself in order to become worse each session (rhythm, timing, bladework) Then what would be the world’s most receptive, improving rower.  If I incentivised you enough are you confident you can do all these things to become the worst….?  [they are confident that they can choose behaviours to make a bad outcome].  Then talk about the positive and whether there is any difference between the two.  Commit to doing the change.  Remind them on the water “you are choosing to be rather ineffective right now.  Do you want to carry on making this choice, because I’ll support you fully….”
Working with cricketers – he gets a list of all the negative things they talk to themselves.  Permission to coach them using the same negative phrases while they are facing a batting machine….. this makes them realise that if someone else talks to them in the same way they talk to themselves it isn’t a good thing.
 

David Tanner - the Road to Beijing

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

The Post Athens Perspective
-    Rowing without Pinsent and Redgrave
-    Building on the results from 2004 – 3 medals for women, 1 gold for mens sweep, poor performances from lightweights
Everyone remembers the Olympics results and can ‘forgive’ any failings in the World Championships.


This will be the first Olympics since 1984 when we will be going without either Pinsent or Redgrave on the team.  That year was the breakthrough for GB rowing…. the first gold since 1948.  In 1996 the rowing gold medal was the ONLY one GB won in the whole games.  Our great media profile is in part due to us producing ‘heroes’ for the public eye.  It didn’t use to be like this we got about 3 pieces a year in the newspapers.  Sydney was the first EVER Olympic medal for GB women, a silver in 4x.  


We now have the best womens sculling squad in the world.  We should ‘deliver’ at Beijing. At Athens only one mens crew made a final…. it won the gold.  This is what counts but we need more crews in finals in Beijing.

Finding and developing Olympians
-    The club is where every rower starts
-    The coach is the greatest single influence on a rower
The dilemma for clubs is that you lose the best athletes quite quickly.  E.g. Richard Spratley got Tom Lucie at Brookes and within 18 months he was 3rd at senior trials and taken away to the GB squad programme.  Richard can be proud of this achievement.
-    World Class Start is 5 years old.  2005 the first WCS athletes came to senior trials; 2007 first medals in Olympic classes and U23 had 6 medallists; 2007 starting Sporting Giants initiative started
-    Trying to find athletes from ‘new and different’ places.  There is a shortage of state sector schools, few universities offer high performance.  This complements the ‘traditional’ rowing schools / universities / clubs programme to world class rowing.
-    Sporting giants is for volleyball, basketball and rowing talent ID.

 
The high performance model depends on
-    Good funding
-    Developing coaches
-    Supporting the rower
-    Top logistics
-    Caversham (GB Rowing’s first base)

“I am still a volunteer in my head, of course I do get paid now, but I still think this is my hobby” David Tanner

More people are able to make Rowing coaching a career than ever before.  There is a career pathway here now.  When GB rowing increased coaches from 2.5 when DT started in 1996, there are now over 20.  There was a fear that this would suck all the good club coaches to the ARA leaving nothing in the clubs.  This hasn’t happened.


Logistics – important.  He visited NZ last week and has found only 2/3 hotels that he considers possibly appropriate for the team when the worlds go to Karapiro in 2010.  Advance planning is key.


Caversham funded by Lottery £13m.  Opened in April 2006.  He doesn’t think it is a coincidence that our best ever World Championships were last year.

 
Create new champions

-    GB Women – Golds in sculling and building the sweep squad. Redgrave visits to give advice.
-    Qualified  womens 4x, 2x, 8. Not qualified W2- or W1x
-    GB Men – making a new four, building the sweep squad, sculling into the medal zone
-    Qualified mens 1x, 2x, 2-, 4-, 8.  Not qualified 4x
-    Lightweights – raising the bar.  Outstandingly good work by coaches and athletes
-    Qualified LM2x, 4-, LW2x.

Target is to win 3 medals in Beijing and 3 A finals.  There are 130 qualified Olympians from UK so far and 41 are rowers.

 
The Paralympic Challenge
-    Rowing becomes the only new paralympic sport in 2005
-    Four paralympic boat classes – LTA mixed 4+, LTA mixed 2x, AW 1x, AM 1x
-    Secured UK Sport funding and starting to develop the club pathway
-    Top nation at worlds last year was Brazil, UK second.
 

A Podium Programme - Darren Whiter

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

Darren is high performance coach for U23s….

He will talk about..

-    Evaluate, review, debrief and prepare
-    Physiological development
-    Technical development
-    The podium coach

Converting top places into medal performances in Beijing. 

“Tactics are for amateurs, planning and preparation for professionals” Field Marshall Slim

“Victorious armies often make the mistake of preparing for the ware they have just fought rather than the next one” Winston Churchill

A systematic winning review – know the outcomes and understand why.  Performance predictability is important strength for UK Rowing.


Planning to Perform
-    What are the key demands for the athlete in this sport?  What proportion are for racing and training and the specific demands of a gold medal race.
-    What is the limiting factor in rowing…. and our limiting factor?
Physiology required for rowing
-    High force, low cadence
-    A race is 80-90% aerobic
-    The skills are quite gross
-    Pacing strategy is more physiological than psychological
-    Oxygen uptake is a limiting factor
Physical preparation
-    Endurance: the ability to sustain a high aerobic power output required to maintain boat speed for 2k race
-    Strength: the ability to apply a high force to the feet and the handle especially in the start phase.  After the start the biggest influence in power which gives distance in between strokes
-    Power: the ability (can’t type fast enough – Darren speaks quickly)

Darren showed the ARA training model – available from the ARA
The programme is high volume classic steady state which has these benefits.  
-    It gives a stable and progressive form over months / years
-    Development of economy of movement and skills
-    Low psychological stress
-    Weight control
-    Enables best training of utilisation of oxygen at muscular level
-    Low acute injury risk
-    Big tapering end results
Disadvantages of Steady state
-    Time
-    Risk of chronic overuse injury
-    Boredom
-    Slow progression of form
-    Enough stimulus of central lung / heart?
-    Regression of fast twitch fibres
-    Risk of overtraining

Programming is a balancing act
Training versus recovery is the most important of all.
Rowers supervise their own recovery (coaches supervise training).
A typical week’s programme is 25-30 hours and about 200km, 14-18 sessions, over 6/7 days of which 2-4 are weights and the rest is endurance.
Sessions are usually simple with a basic structure soothe athletes can focus easily and delivery good quality. 

Jurgen Grobler “The best training is simple training”.  Doing the basics very well under extreme pressure.

The programme can make people immune-stressed and makes them vulnerable to viruses.  Work hard on hand cleaning, alcohol wipes, First Defence nasal spray.
“We spent the whole war looking for the magic technological bullet. We never found it.  Battles continued to be won or lost depending on the basic fighting courage and ability of the man on the ground”.  US General in Vietnam
[Darren likes military metaphors]
There is the opportunity for lots of technology but we also do the basics very well.

Robin Williams “the criticality of skill failure in racing”.

Successful rowers do the basics well.

-    Posture
-    Effective stroke length
-    Sequencing of drive phase
-    Distance per stroke
All the way through the speed/rating progression

Posture – we want the back to be pretty static (10-12 degrees only).  Load should be low in the boat.  Sit tall, drive low.
Stroke Length – distance per stroke = length of stroke.  Vertical shins, arms loosely extended, shoulders neutral
Effective power phase sequencing – large muscles first and add weaker ones to assist.  Bodyweight then legs, back, arms.  A leg-based stroke.  Legs = 50%; trunk 30% and arms 20% of total power.
Power and distance per stroke – distance in between strokes = power per stroke

The podium coach qualities
-    Planning a programme
-    Communication to individuals
-    Prioritise key actions and cut out irrelevance
-    identify end goal and
-    Good motivators
-    Personal discipline and focus
-    Self confident aura
-    Converts opportunities
-    Looks after the rower best interests
-    Willing to seek advice
-    Composure under pressure
-    Able to stand back from rower
-    Reviews their performance constantly
-    Synthesise the technical, physical and mental side with teamship.


Questions

What techniques do you use to prevent overtraining?the coaches delivering the programme consistently monitor rowers to see they are handling the training load well.  Monitoring / testing.

How is the programme periodised? This year we have a lot of camps.  We do a little less at home and do more on camp.   the sequence of events dictates the workload mostly.

What should a young coach focus on? The most important thing is to recognise that others have gone ahead of you to discover what works.  It is unnecessary to keep trying things that don't work.  Use the experience of others.   Be a good motivator to your athletes.  They often need more than appears.

How do you reassess athletes who miss training due to injury? Illness is generally straightforward - alter training on the day they come back.  The coach deals and if backs off for more than 3 days it goes to the medics team.  They set the exercise programme with chief coach and get nurtured back in at the appropriate time.  It usually takes a bit longer than we think.  For long term injuries the squad doctor runs it and the coach monitors the rehab programme.  

Rest and recovery? Programme is mostly left to the athletes.  Al Smith the team physiologist did some presentations to the squad about this.  Simple nutrition, hydration, sleep quality, hot/cold treatments, be hygienic.   

Are there opportunities for coaches to visit and watch the reality not the theory?  There are opportunities to visit Caversham.  Speak to Rosie Mayglothing who can arrange this.  [Rosie says this doesn't always need a more experienced coach - you and work with people at your level they just have a different perspective.] 

Developing Juniors by Richard Boulton

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

Pathway to junior rowing…. you don't need to be enormous compared to WCS… more about the traditional pathway.  We don't select because we think they WILL be good.  We work with those who turn up at clubs and schools and who choose to row.


Participation

Teach to train and compete - local identification in clubs and schools by local coaches

Encourage to train properly - higher levels 

Send to GB Junior trials - Richard visits local regattas and tries to spot good athletes

GB Junior trials month by month
October 2k ergo at 24.  This is an early identification trial entry and registration in BIRO scheme
November EIDT 1x 5km trial at Boston
December 5km ergo rate 24
January 5 km ergo rate 28 (keep training over Christmas)
February Long Distance Trial 5km 1x or 2-
March 2km ergo at free rate [the first time we are really interested in the scores]
April Spring assessments side by side at Nottingham, seat racing – learning what will happen at final trials, selection for Munich
May Munich Junior International Regatta – race the Germans who often do well at junior worlds
June - Ergo 2k free rate
July – final trials and selection (3 weeks to the big race)
August – Junior World Champs

It is a single year cycle repeated each year.  Junior worlds combine every 4th year with the non-Olympic events to a larger regatta.  Selection in UK is only based on performance.
Issue is only 3 weeks from selection to Championships. 25 Junior Men  and 22 Junior Women – max team size.  Team tends to change each year because few are good enough to do 2 years at junior level.

2007 Average Ergo scores – JM 6:21.4 JW 7:20.1 – broadly correlated with success.  Reducing most years in 2002 boys were 6:34.3 and girls 7:21.  The boys tend to medal each year but girls less successful.  Difference boys to girls is about 50 seconds…. but issue right now is the girls are mostly a minute behind.
Targets for successes – they are gold medal times for Junior Worlds.  Reassess each year.
 

The Coupe de la Jeunesse
A second string team for sub-world champs level athletes.  We run a big final trials in order to select two full teams.  First run 1985 and over 3 days now.  Based on points total for the team.  Can swap athletes between crews as race both on Saturday (heat, final) and Sunday (heat, final). 

We do get athletes through the coup and move onto Juniors the following year.  It is the top achievement for some athletes.  It is tough and not a breeze!  GB always sends a full team and we’ve won it 9 times (France 8 times, Italy 5 times).  30 boys, 16 girls (they double up into the 8 and race on Friday).
Coup Ergos 2007 boys 6:29.4 and girls 7.27.9. 

Trial selections
October target was 7 minutes for boys and 7:55 for girls.  We got 183 boys and 99 girls beating these targets.
January 5 km at rate 28 boys had to be less than 17.50 and 120 came.  Girls 20:10 and 39 made the cut.
June 2km ergo at free rate boys 6:30 and 58 made it; girls 7:20 and 9 made it. 
This really shows the drop-off.
 

The GB-France Match
There is a third team:
This is very different – the kids don’t have the same trials selection.  It is a ‘roll up’ race – first past the post goes on the team.  We have domestic and international J16s in the team.  Exceptional J15s can also make the grade.  This is all club combinations – we want ready-made crews for most events except the 8.  We want Club units at a young level at their age group and to give them their first taste of success.
They can never come less than second! 


We always send a full team 28 boys and 23 girls including spares (But not coxes).
There is also a WCS UK versus France regatta but they can only row if have been 12 months or less in the sport.
Ergos: boys 6:41 girls 7:43 in 2007.


Junior training progression
When a parent approaches you and asks about their child you should ask
-    How much should they train
-    How often should they train
-    Should they lift weights
-    More on water or more on gym
-    How to cope with training during exams and revision


There is a cunning chart how much and how often… which I can’t reproduce  because it’s tiny on the screen.  Don’t want to see J12 or J13s training 8 times a week. 


J11-J13 – mainly skills, up to 3 short sessions per week (time on water not distance covered).  Rowing shouldn’t dominate their age – they do other things, music, drama, cubs / brownies.  Don’t push them into it too early
J14 – still only 4 sessions a week.  Weight lifting technique only.  Light bars – no weights.  Teach them to work on the water and build the technique on the land.
Junior level – at J17/J18 they should be at their best…. 7/8 sessions building to 10 depending on exams and time (maybe 14 after exams).  One session per week off. 

To make the Junior worlds team they have to be capable of training 2-3 times per day for a week at a time (e.g. at camp and final trials seat racing).  This means they are preparing for the next level.  Capable of 20km UT2 outing.  With rest between sessions. If they get injured or sick, they won’t make the grade.

This depends on
-    Coach availability
-    Equipment available
-    Safety – numbers on the water
-    Weather
-    Time of athletes available
-    Club’s requirements
-    Demands and needs of the individual and the club
-    Aspirations of parents and coach

Make it enjoyable, it is not just about performance.  We have a duty to look to the long term development of the individual as a whole.   Education in more than just rowing.  They have to learn time management, have a family life (Sunday lunch), academic qualifications (the boys at Hampton who succeeded at rowing had better than average results because they learnt how to manage their time), manage social life, manage their health (growth spurts), other activities (music, Church, drama). 

Keep the variety, fun, teach skill development and quality MUST be in the programme.  This is essential.

Teach sculling and sweep and both individual and crew boats

Basics:
-    Correct use of the hands, bladework (correctly taught at the start they won’t have to un-learn it later)
-    Core strength – not necessarily a separate session – but part of the programme – it can be water technical sessions with core exercises within it.
-    Rest and recovery – as important as the sessions.  Without good rest the next session won’t be good.
-    Are they eating properly?Use a cycle of hard / medium / light weeks

Try to have at least one complete rest day per week (not a day off rowing in order to go running!)

We the coaches have the responsibility to see the individual athletes have the tools to survive the programme.

Mental, endurance, skills, technique, strength, general training, how to look after their hands.


How we are improving junior rowing?
-    We need emphasis on small boat performances
-    Ergo monitoring for older children
-    Periodisation of training programme
-    Training peaks including loading and tapering
-    Ensure paddling UT2 training is functional (perfect practice makes perfect and permanent)
-    Train how you want to race – technique good at rate 18
-    Practice the skills (there is nothing worse than taking on a group of athletes who don’t have the skills to survive that level)
-    Ergo – get the intensity right.  It is not a race.
-    Standardise monitored sessions.  Keep records.
-    Don’t de-train technical skills on the ergo by allowing poor technique.


Support for Juniors
Funding – lottery (for the very best), SportsAid, Local Councils
Subsidy of camps and events (Nantes just happened and was subsidised £20k)
Boats on loan (the National system has some boats it can help with).
Education
Training days and camps (get the best together so they can be identified)
Join the Junior mail-out list (training sessions, suggestions, programmes) free information and support for coaches and clubs.

Questions 

Why are girls not hitting the ergo targets? We need more girls in the system – more chance of finding the top athletes.  We treat girls differently.  Some coaches won’t ask the same things of girls as boys.  Some of the coaches of girls do not coach that level long enough.  The boys sweep are our most successful group at junior level.  This is because the coaches of the groups have an inbuilt structure that the same coach has J15s for many years.  Learns from mistakes and improves year on year.  Generally for junior girls and scullers the same coach takes the group from J13 through to J18. They don’t re-do the same year group and learn from their mistakes.  Also when they do switch year groups they coach and learn from their predecessors.  The best coaches take the youngest athletes. Our coaching methods – we need better tools for girls don’t be scared.  Sport in schools has reduced and for girls particularly it is un-cool (I don’t want to put on muscle).


Should they abolish racing for very young age groups? Richard is very against racing for the very young.  I try to stop it.  The type of racing that has been pushed through.  There should be fun-style, mixed up, short stuff in regattas.  [Pete Shepherd added – our sport has changed and more young kids join at J10, J11 when it used to be J14.  We have to be smart with what we do with them so they stay in the sport.] 


Using weights during growth spurts?  Individualise the programme to manage kids having growth spurts.  It is harder with schools when you have 30 kids to spot those being ‘weak’ because they are growing.  Work with low / no weights.


Would the junior performance be enhanced if they were available sooner in the summer? Yes it would. But it’s good for kids to get the all round education in their schools e.g. Henley, National Schools.  We can’t offer the same experience.
 

Adrian Cassidy - from Zero to Hero

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

From Beginner to GB medallist, Adrian Cassidy, World Class Start Performance Development Coach.

Adrian started one of the pilot World Class Start projects in Cambridge…. impressive coaching record.  

A pathway to international rowing… WCS athletes 'do it' because we think they are going to be good.  Compared to juniors who do it because they are having fun at school.


World Class Start

Begun in 2002 and with a clear focus on sculling.  Sporting Giants programme of national search getting 300 athletes, 70 to intensive testing and joining the programme.  Those not making the grade got sent to high performance clubs.

We identify exceptional athletes for British athlete and develop the best of them.
This is designed to win Olympic medals because they fund the sport. 
What is it like for an athlete to be on WCS? 
•    Go to schools and identify the athletes;
•    Bring them to centres across UK and teach them to train properly. 
•    Use camps 9x per year as a testing forum to measure development and show improvement.
•    Selected for national team



Talent identification.
 

Centres located in areas with good school population within 5 miles of a club with good rowing water.  Meet Head Teacher and sports staff.  Looking for 15-16 year old boys and girls.  We visit and test at the school  The PE teachers bring the right children together.  Tall kids and keen ones who want to test.  Talk about fitness testing in the school to explain the programme.  In Cambridge tested 8-900 children and picked 5. 


Each child gets a letter explaining the test results and they can take this to the local club if they still want to row.  The selected children get a family meeting to explain the programme.
Tests came from Australia…. started with 125 tests and reduced to 3.  Size, Strength, Endurance.  Rowing is a simple sport to test compared to testing / diving etc.

  1. C2 dyno, leg press, bench pull bench press.  Length and strength
  2. Leg and arm bike for endurance (the most powerful test). It shows the tough kids.
  3. Anthropometric – height, armspan. Cut off 188cm boys and 178 girls.  At 16 years… Weight and armspan.  Want people with greater armspan than height.  198 tall and 212 armspan!

Meet the family of the child.  When you arrive you can see the lifestyle, living arrangements (Divorced parents).  This gives insight into how we deal with the children later.  Tell the children the scores are down to their parents – genetics, food and upbringing.  They explain the full story of what an international athlete is like – cold, wet, no social life….. invariably the children really want to do it!  Only 4 have turned WCS down at this point.
We leave the family to think about it and if they decide to accept, they  start a 6 month probation.  If they don’t develop, and cope with the training and can’t perform under pressure they will not succeed.


WCS Camps

Adrian describes the programme as ‘cut throat’ because of the focus on Olympic medals.  It’s a great environment particularly for girls who
They have to organise better to work and train – many get better GCSE grades because of their organisational skills.
Camps are just about testing…. if you are not improving it’s immediately obvious.  All the kids are trying to beat each other.  The performance culture is there – the stopwatch counts.  It is too daunting for some…. we have to be human to deal with that.  Many of these join clubs and join the national rowing scene.

We publicly reward success – PB or particular skills.  How they stand when recognised shows pride.
Visits from experts in hydration, nutrition, lifestyle skills.  Need also to communicate this to parents too.



Development Pathway

Promote athletes based on performance only
-    Skills
-    Boat speed
-    Power per stroke
-    Competitive times pieces in 1x

Boat speeds

-    Testing in 1x based on senior gold medal times …. % changes with their age…always the same target

Land testing

-    Don’t promote based on land test results, only water
-    Flexibility
-    Strength training (weights)
-    Cross training (bike, run, swim, cross trainer) – to keep volume training up while skills develop
-    Ergometer (Concept2)

From week one they do 6 sessions a week…..Important to commit time and organise their life straight away.
Generally you have to be strong enough to pull a decent ergo to become an Olympic Champion… a few exceptions can’t do good erg scores.


Skills

  • Circles – straight into fine single
  • Timed repetitions – get promoted into groups of people who have similar scores
  • Balance – at catch with blades off water (record is 10 minutes!)
  • 360 degree turn – a clear correlation in speed turning boat and 1k rate 24 pieces…. it builds confidence early (record is 24 seconds) and use a lot of power to make it work


Group D is the bottom at camp…. 6 months should be able to get into Group C.  Get tested twice before promotion

Group D
2k at rate 24 one with the conditions and one against…. need 71% of GMT (Gold medal target)

Group C
2 x 1500 at rate 26 and need 77% GMT.  Done as side by side and a time trial.

Group B
2x 1500 at 28 getting 83% GMT.

Group A
2 x 1500 at rate 30 achieving 89%.


At a windy camp it’s harder to make the times….but the world champs can be windy.
Juniors to make GB selection need to achieve 80-82% and medallists get 82-84% (for the crew boats… need 86% to win a medal as junior single sculler)
U23 final trials need 84%, 86% plus to get selected and medallists get 88%+ to medal.
It clearly takes several years to make this transition from Junior to U23.
Seniors 85% to get invited to trials, 88%+ to get selected


Coaches' Role

“I am motivated to coach motivated athletes….”
-    Enthuse the athletes
-    Empower the athlete to make choices – good and bad.  Learn from mistakes.

-    Build athlete’s self confidence through use of training programme (beat a target)-    Elite athletes are demanding, awkward, belligerent, think they know more than you… Then job is to wean them off dependence on the coach.

Because of this difference they don’t fit into the mainstream club programme… they are special.

Summary

As coaches how do we take exceptional athletes we find good enough to make the national team?-    Identify talented athletes….you have to do something different for them IF they want to go to the top
-    Create a performance culture for them (hard for us to integrate into a club programme) relentless pursuit of goal while still making it fun
-    Develop the performance brain – let the talent come out – re-educate them to think like winners (note not rudeness)
-    Develop performance
-    Build training programme towards the GB Programme and prepare them for that training
There are reasons but no excuses!


Questions

How to enthuse parents and children.  If there are issues with schoolwork this has to be sorted in order to stay on the programme.  Because some U23s have to do a regatta the day before their finals… these pressures have to be coped with.

What about costs?  Funding goes into coaches employement but we have subsidised camps and the rowing club membership is also paid by the children's parents.  If they really struggle financially we try to help out.  Children don't get paid or any direct grant funding until they perform.   
We brief parents carefully about money.  The clubs provide the boats initially but if they are to be successful, most will want to buy a boat.

Connection between Clubs and WCS?  some clubs are big and can cope well and involve them closely.  Other clubs have fewer members.  They ALWAYS race as their clubs and represent them.  We are clear in our set up agreement with the club about what the mutual responsibilities are. 

Can they join younger?  We have picked exceptional kids younger.  One of the issues of 15 / 16 is that once they've learnt to row they only have one year as a junior.  It is a balancing act.

What support is given to the drop outs to continue in rowing?  Quite a lot.  WE are very objective in data so kids see performance.  When they stop it is difficult because their friends are continuing.  We make sure this is a mature decision not a failure.  It is important.  Nobody has been kicked off the scheme… it has always been by mutual agreement. 

The % achievements how are they set? Gold times are set by Jurgen and Tommo.  Worked out the % by working back from athletes who win medals back to the camp results they produced in earlier years.  There is a clear correlation and speeds they have to achieve in order to medal. 

Are the results published?  Selection we have rough cut offs but we choose kids with different scores, particularly on Dyno.  Less so on the bike.  Bike test 1 min at 60 rpm, 1 min at 70 until they blow up.  Record is 97.  A boy should be able to do 90. Girls scores are harder to pick - but the sporting giants kids produce awesome scores.

Links to talent ids in other sports?  Not much.  We did a bit with Canoeing… but they picked people with smaller heights than us!  Our tests are easy compared to diving, football and tennis who find it harder to select future talent in this way.