News

Archive for the 'Coaching' Category

Do Mars and Venus Row Differently?

Tuesday, July 15th, 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Of late I have been coaching various crews in Cambridge UK, the Robinson College 1st Women’s boat and some crews from Champion of the Thames, and have been coaching women for the first time for a number of years.  All the crews have been preparing themselves for The Bumps
Apart from being great fun this experience has re-confirmed a belief I formed many years ago.  Men and women are different!  So what?

I often get asked questions along the lines of ‘What differences should there be in the training programme for men and women?’  I don’t think there should be a significant difference.  I believe men and women can, and should, row the same way, train the same way; do the same amount of work.


Where I see the difference is in the attitudes displayed.  These are merely generalisations, but like all good generalisations, have a grain of truth in them.  If a men’s boat isn’t going well the first reaction from most of the crew is ‘The others are messing it up for me’.  Women react with the polar opposite ‘Sorry, I am messing it up for you’.  

The interesting question for me is how I should react, and yes I know my views are filtered through my attitudes and experiences, and are therefore not truly objective, coaching is a subjective business.  

What are your experiences and suggestions?


Duncan

Selection dilemmas.

Friday, July 11th, 2008

Selection in the club


In Cambridge we are winding up to the Town Bumps. This site gives an explanation  and you can find some video here .
In the club I race for, Champion of the Thames , we are finalising selections for the crews. We have nine men's boats entered so there is necessarily lots of juggling.  A nice little dilemma has arisen which encapsulates quite a lot of the difficulties in such a club.

 
The background is that the club has 5 or so 8's that exist all year, train more or less regularly, and race at most of the local events.  While there is a pecking order there is no formal selection and the crews are more like groups of friends than teams in a hierarchy.  The club has been doing well recently, the top crew is in the first division of bumps and boats 2 and 3 are also going well.

Now, we are one of the lower boats, did well 2 years ago, less well last year in Div 3 and are looking forward to this year because we think we are going better and have a chance to get some bumps. We have a new recruit in the crew, big, strong, young and competent, he was introduced to us by the club and we have gladly taken him in.  Now it is obvious how good he is the higher boats want him and the club is suggesting he move up.  What to do?
A nice little moral problem.  Do we go with club loyalty or crew loyalty?  Does the new man stay with us, help us go well, or go up help the other crew and leave us slower?  

Isn't it great how even trivial sports events have the ability to make us face up to difficult questions!

Duncan

What is a coach?

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

What is a coach?

 

I have just bought a lovely old book from Way’s bookshop in Henley on Thames.  It is Roy Meldrum’s ‘Coach and Eight’, first published in 1932.  Meldrum was a leading coach of the time who was a leader of the orthodox school of rowing who were epitomised by the Lady Margaret BC and in opposition to the Fairbairn types from Jesus College BC.

 

Meldrum starts the book with the following passage;

‘A coach is someone of either sex, usually a man at present, who borrows a bicycle and rides beside a crew.  When there is a gale or a poor choice among bicycles, he sometimes rides behind the crew; and sometimes sees for the first time things he had not suspected.  He can see as much and in greater comfort if he has a bicycle of his own; as much, but perhaps with less comfort if he is honoured with a horse.’


 

There is a lot of wisdom in this short passage. Leaving aside the horse, about which I am not qualified to comment, let us think for a moment about what a coach is.  Like many I started my coaching career when I could no longer row.  Was it not G B Shaw who said ‘He who can does, he who cannot, teaches’?  Relatively few of the top coaches around were top performers themselves.  Is this because the success top performers had has satisfied their thirst?  Is it that the sad people who coach are those who failed to achieve and now eke out a miserable existence warming their egos at the fires of the next generation?  I like to think that coaching and performing are so different that few people have the breadth of personality and diversity of skill to succeed at both.

 

An associated question that is exercising many around the world at this time of year is ‘How to identify a good coach?’  The season has already seen its share of coaches moved on, dropped or not re-employed and the searches for their successors, discreet and otherwise, are starting.  Every year sees a similar merry go round.  The same coaches are shuffled between the same jobs, and off we go again for another season.  It has echoes of the greater idiocies perpetrated by the owners of football clubs.

 

May I suggest to those searching for a coach that they first look at themselves and their own failings before setting out to find a coach whom they can blame when things go wrong next season?

 

To return to the headline; ‘What is a coach?’   Did you hear the one about the rugby club who called guy who ran their practices Bus, because he certainly wasn’t a coach?!

Duncan Holland 

Why I love the Bumps

Friday, June 20th, 2008

Those who know me know I have spent the last 3 years in Cambridge UK.  Cambridge and Oxford are the only places I know of that have Bumps racing .  I think it is fantastic!.  The river Cam where the Bumps are held in Cambridge is tiny, the rowing stretch is 5km long, windy and between 1 and 2 lanes wide.  The Bumps are a form of racing that allows up to 2,000, yes 2,000, people to race in the course of an afternoon.  All shapes, sizes and abilities can get out there and have a go.


Over the last 3 years I have mostly been busy with various high-performance projects but this year I helped a student crew for the College Bumps.  Robinson College’s 1st women weren’t a top of the division star boat but I had great fun.  The women competed brilliantly, right to the best of their ability, and bumped up 3 nights and rowed over the other.  The bumps format allowed them to have 4 closely fought races with their peers in 4 days, produced exciting racing for them and the spectators, and generally encapsulated much of what I think sport should be.  I had great fun!

The fun I had with the Robinson crew made my decision easy;  The crew I raced for myself in the Town Bumps 2 years ago was starting to firm up the personnel for this year’s races and wanted to know If I was keen?  The answer is a definite yes.  Foolish I know.  Fifty somethings with dodgy backs and sundry other body parts shouldn’t be pretending to be 20 again.  Anyway I’m keen and Champion of the Thames (a Cambridge club named for a pub) has an enthusiastic recruit.  I’ll keep you posted about our progress.

[note from Editor, the London University colleges also have bumps racing although on the tidal Thames it's slightly different with people standing waist deep holding onto the chains at low tide to enable a 'fair' start!] 

Was Luzern a missed opportunity for the GB Men?

Thursday, June 5th, 2008

Most commentators appeared surprised that the 4- could only manage 8th. Britain's rowers suffer sinking feeling  I would echo Sir Steven Redgrave’s comment on TV ‘Why did they start?’  But not for the reason Redgrave offered; that there is no point staring with a crew with 2 subs and little chance of winning.

I see a missed opportunity in the other crews in the sweep team.

The 8+ has been producing steady results of late with Bronzes at the ’07 world’s and the 1st world Cup this year.  With the decision to put all the top athletes who weren’t in the 4- into the 8+ the team signalled an intention to strengthen the big boat rather than chase 3 medals this year.  Logical enough, though maybe un-ambitious for a rowing nation as strong as GB.
At Munich Tom James was replaced by Tom Lucy from one of the 2-‘s thus leaving the 8+ to get a good measure of its speed.   At Luzern however with the removal of Smith from the 8+ to the 4- and Lucy still in the 4-, neither crew was able to learn much about their true position and ranking.   Would it not have been better to race the desired 8+ and 2- and get some hard data?  Luzern is clearly the fairest and best course on which to test a crew against the opposition.

The decision reminds me of the situation last year at Amsterdam where the 4- were put in a super 8+ that duly went fast but provided little useful information.  The team had spoken all year of trying Hodge and Reed in the 2- to see if they really were as quick as a series of GB trials wins had suggested.  If instead Hodge and Reed had raced the 2- this would have allowed for a decision on what boat to put the top pairing into to be made on the basis of performances on the international stage.  As it is we still don’t know how they would go against the likes of Ginn and Free.

Now the sweep group must go to the final World Cup in Poznan with neither the 4-, nor the 2- crews having had any chance to race in their selected line-ups, and with the 8 only having had one race.  This is not a good situation to be in a few weeks out from the Olympics.  If the 8+ and 2- had started in their proper line-ups at Luzern then the team would have had a chance to adjust where necessary and to gain valuable extra race practice at Poznan.  As it is they are going in to the last regatta before Beijing still in experimental mode.

Interview with Charles Barksdale, Coach, Texas Rowing Center

Friday, April 4th, 2008

I was recently in Austin, Texas, and approached the local club to borrow a single. During my visit I was introduced to Charles Barksdale the energetic coach who has helped to build a very successful and inclusive local rowing community.  Charles does two jobs and each job is different – he works as a Boatman on the University of Texas Varsity Programme and takes care of the equipment, tune up rig, repair and drive the trailer and as the Head Club Coach, at the Texas Rowing Center, he says, “This job allows me to coach.  My philosophy is to try to get as many people out on the water as possible.”

What is your background in the sport?
  I have been rowing since ‘95 and coaching since ‘98.  I wanted to be a better rower and so I started to coach.  Now I am a better coach than I ever was a rower since I am not an ‘ideal’ body shape (5’10” and 170 lbs) but most importantly, I still love it.  
When I started the first things I learnt that no one way is right.  Every athlete is different and the most interesting part is that no matter who you are dealing with you have to find a new way to help them fix the problem.  Look at their background and manipulate your coaching to get them to do things.  This keeps me on my toes and so I am never stagnate and I never do the same thing twice.

What are the differences between the groups you coach?  Coaching kids – you want a quick session, on and off the water fast.  Don’t give them a lot of information – they figure it out themselves.
By comparison, masters (veterans) want to know everything – they are constantly asking “why am I doing this?”.  Masters keep me on my toes the kids are the second hardest group to coach because they have parents!
Open athletes you don’t coach – you give suggestions.  They are wrapped into coaching themselves – you are not training them just moulding.  If they don’t get the right answers from you as a coach they will go and find another coach.  Open rowers sometimes have 6 – 8 coaches because they take what they want from each one.  I usually advise them, “Go find out what works for you and tell me”.  I need to know.  I am a two way street – If you don’t ask me question it is hard for me to tell what you need.  

Charles Barksdale  
(more…)

More feedback on ARA conference

Monday, February 4th, 2008

There is a formal discussion forum available to UK OARA subscribed members at the new RowHow website. and the forum is here .

And a backchannel written by Rebecca Caroe on her rowing blog is here

New ROWHOW website

Sunday, January 27th, 2008

Rich Stock, OARA Club and Coach Resources office

New distance learning system

In-house system www.rowhow.org RowHow
News on front page… latest resources for coaches, and a calendar
More interactive content and fewer “pdf for downloads”
Easier layout and navigate
Same login details as main ARA site (just tried it and my login doesn't work… I probably forgot it!) 

Content will include

  • more coaching L2 and L3
  • coxing - new introductory certificate in development
  • Child protection qualifications & updates
  • water safety
  • beginner skills / teach yourslef rowing
  • trailer driving

Hazard awareness for coxes (like the UK driving test)  what to wear - dress a paper doll!, computer game avoiding other boats, bingo identifying boat types, dominoes matching boat type

Day 2, ARA Coaching Conference - Chris Shambrook: Intelligence for Coaching

Sunday, January 27th, 2008


Chris Shambrook: Intelligence for Coaching

 Discuss the most rewarding coaching experience you ever had round the table.  What did you feel like?
Emotional intelligence for coaching rowing
First test
-    Write down 4/5 words about the athletes who are easiest to coach
-    Alongside write down 4/5 words about how you feel when coaching them
Chicken or Egg?  What comes first – the great athlete or is it how you are thinking / feeling leading their response to your lead.
Discuss (now do the reverse for negative feelings)
We felt you have to ‘act’ and always be positive, but when you get nothing back from the athletes it is draining emotionally.
There is resource you have available to you influences the performance of the crew.
Performance = potential minus interference which prevents performance
-    Coaching performance
-    Individual athlete performance
-    Crew performance
Quote from Jurgen Grobler “We often ask is it the athlete? Or is it the coach.  Well that is a challenge, a bit motivation for me.”
Chris described this a ‘healthy’ paranoia…..!



Boat speed

-    Physical, technical, biomechanical, tactical options.  If we have exhausted improved boat speed via these means
-    Then focus on EI (Emotional Intelligence) by getting athletes more consistently in tune to how they are thinking and how it makes them feel is there an advantage to be gained here?
-    Will EI unlock more potential with the core elements?
-    Value of explicit EI work versus implicit consideration through good coaching



Stephen Covey mantras

“seek first to understand and then be understood”
-    We need to be world class in our ability to do this.
-    What’s it like to be in the receiver mode when you are asking an athlete, why don’t you understand what I am saying?
“we tend to judge ourselves by our intentions and others by their behaviours”
-    Many athletes seem to have the intention of doing stuff wrong because their behaviour is showing mistakes.  Clearly this isn’t true all the time.
-    Can you be confident that the athletes’ behaviours are matched up with their intentions?
-    Is your communication as positive and helpful as possible and are you receiving back in a positive way and recognise what you get back in order to then be positive back again to the athlete?
-    Both of these result in the asking of different questions and a changing of perspective.
-    Sometimes being autocratic in coaching is exactly the right thing to do

If you don’t keep control of thoughts and emotions at key points in a game / match difficult things can happen – computer rage, players fighting.  A dis-connect between thought and emotion.
Most of the time EI is probably working very well because you don’t see the negative things coming out.
Good examples of many people interacting at the same time and keeping focus e.g. open heart surgery, F1 pit crew (24 people for 10 seconds round a car), rowing coaches monitor many things at one time (water conditions, how others are moving, stopwatch, megaphone, drive a launch – multi tasking).


You’re contagious
Attitudes are contagious – is yours worth catching?  Use this when selecting athletes and how they will perform in the changing room, in training, during a match.  When you spend time with people you tend to share moods – within 2 hours.  Research in work meetings proved this.
People who are more committed to the team are likely to link moods more readily.
Task 2: Think about your club / squad.  Which person is most likely to set the mood? Where does the emotional lead come from?


Coaches tend to set the tone

-    Emotional spread is often done by leaders – because they talk more, but people listen to people with authority and has more chance to influence
-    Leaders tend to comment first on matters and subsequent comments build on that first comment
-    The leader’s interpretation of a situation provides the reference point for the group so appropriate emotional reaction is a function of the message sent out by the leader.
-    Where are the opportunities when you can choose to spread a positive / negative mood?  Team debrief after an outing, before a race briefing


Positive emotions = better performance. 
Feel more relaxed / confident, relaxed.  Increased mental efficiency, flexibility of thought, mopre likely to break a movement pattern if they feel positive.  If not feeling like that they revert to safety their traditional way of moving.
Upbeat moods increase the positive view of others – tends to make better connection for teamwork.
Increased optimism of success leads to increases creativity and decision making and helpfulness within the crew.
The ability of a leader to pitch a group into an enthusiastic, cooperative mood can determine success.
 

4 quadrants of EI
-    Self awareness – this has to be high – your mental and physical state.  What about your personality and how it interacts with other people.  Are you conscious of your fatigue, concentration levels physically as well.  Remember to look after yourself as well as your athletes
-    Self regulation – can I make choices to change me from how I am now to where I need to be.  How good am I to shift a mood or a thought process to a different one?  How good am I to get phycisal rest and recovery?  Coaching sharpness this is really challenging when your body is tired and your brain needs to pick up on this.
-    Awareness of others – pick up on them once you’ve sorted yourself!  How good are you at others’ physical state, mental state.  Vital.
-    Management of others – how good are you at putting things in place that allows them to shift and move to the most appropriate state for functioning now.


Task 3
Think of each EI quadrant as 100% score possibilities.  What is your current profile in each of the 4 segments?  Consider the right side and the left side of the grid.

How am I?

How are they?

How do I need to be

How do they need to be?

You are doing this technically all the time with athletes
technically.  Now add in the EI side to
include emotion and thought.  Will this
help you as a coach?  Making a conscious
choice to bring this into your coaching will that make it more effective.  If you do it implicitly you could probably
improve from unconscious competence to conscious competence.

Ask the question, do I need to change how the athletes are
in order to change what they are doing?

Be alert to what is interfering with the communication
process. May be worth taking off the water for a discussion rather than trying
to solve it during an outing.

Most of sports psychology is about getting athletes to
choose their thoughts and feelings in order to deliver success.  Can you do this systematically (visualisation,
arousal levels, pep talk, pre-race plan) and can you do it consistently?

The challenge

-         
There is the here and now version of the grid.  What’s happening now?

-         
Then what happens in preparation – project ahead
to a situation you are going into.  How
am I typically and how do I need to be in this situation – and for the crew.

-         
Make proactive decisions about how you and they
need to feel and then do everything possible to ensure that you deliver on
those behavioural / attitudinal goals. 
Practise!

-         
Set and evaluation thinking and behavioural
goals


The Self Management Recipe

-    Mood management – how strongly can you rate yourself, recognise and change it or accentuate if required
-    Self-motivation – regular conversations with yourself to keep you motivated, focused. How easy do you find that.  How much time do you invest in this? Regularity?
-    Using intuition – a coaching skill you should pay attention to regularly.  Do you suppress it?
-    Dealing with setbacks – how good is your self-management on this? This is a skill you will be faced with on a regular basis.  If prepared, you can take positive steps on from a setback.  You know how to deal with them.  Visualise the situation.  Sets a good example to athletes
-    Managing energy and peaking for a performance – for yourself.  When is peak moment, how effectively do you have all the resources ready for that moment? When an important week comes up, look at the week prior to ensure you go into the big week as prepared as possible
-    Switching on and off – when you leave the boathouse, can you leave it there and not think about it. 
Identify your strengths and play to them as often as possible.  Practice your key mental skills. 
Concentration - attending to the right thing at the right time.  What are the key things at this time?  Managing energy enables better concentration management.

Management of relationships
-    Motivating others (or not demotivating them) Most people turn up with all the motivation they are going to have and leaders tend to reduce that level of motivation! Can you give a pep talk?
-    Leading others – giving them a view of where you are going, the map of the journey.  What is your style of leading?
-    Coaching others – most of your time is spent doing technique, can you add in other umbrella concepts as well
-    Collaboration – how good are you at this?
-    Confrontation? 
-    Facilitation relationships between others – allowing each athlete to be aware of the strengths of others, how to get the most out of them when in crew boats together,

Getting on the same page… if all this works
Being emotionally intelligent involves
-    Noticing feelings
-    Paying attention to them
-    Recognising their importance
-    Using your thoughts about them to make decisions about how to respond
This applies to your own feelings and those of others.

Crew EI
-    A crew may react differently e.g. stroke may be very self involved and not aware of what’s going on around
-    Bow may be very focused on everyone else but not very focused on themselves
-    2 – may be focused on the thoughts and feelings of the coach rather than themselves
-    3 – may be good at focusing both on themselves and the crew as a whole
-    As a coach you have to consider both the individuals and the whole crew…. what is the style of each athlete…..
-    Athletes who are good at noticing feelings are often also good at kinaesthetic awareness (how their body is moving)

What EI rates – “self”
Definitions  on sheet in pack…. give yourself a score rate 1-10
-    Emotional resilience – maintaining positive
-    Personal power – the degree that you believe you are in charge of and take responsibility for the things in your life rather than seeing yourself as a victim of circumstance
-    Goal directedness – important as a coach.  The degree to which your behaviour is related to your own long term goals.
-    Flexibility – how good are you at being blocked off and coming up with new ways to overcome, flexible thinking
-    Personal openness and connectedness – how readily people see you as approachable and how effective people see you are in terms of making relationships.
-    Invitation to trust – how trustworthy are you. Do you act congruently with your aims and goals.  If you say you will do something do you do it regularly?

What EI rates – “others”
There is a ‘sweet spot’ with just enough and not too much or too little of all of these.
-    Trust – you can be too trusting (mistrustful, carefully trusting, over trusting) do you trust athletes to do things on their own.
-    Balanced outlook (pessimistic, realistically optimistic, over optimistic) when preparing a crew… what would your athletes say about you
-    Emotional expression and control (under controlled, free and in charge, over controlled) is emotion something that happens to you (are you Dr Spock and over controlled)
-    Conflict handling (passive, assertive, aggressive) What is your style?
-    Interdependence (dependent, interdependent, independent) What is the balance of working with others, do you let others work with you?

Specific needs for coaching
Pre race pep talk – how are you typically and how do you need to be to give the best send-off? How are the athletes and how do you need them to be?
Post race debrief after a defeat – how are you typically and how do you need to be?  What is the challenge in an emotional sense for you?
Post race debrief after a surprise victory – to build on this.  Typical reaction versus ideal.

 
Question

How do you stop people talking themselves down?  Come up with two different sets of recipes – how do you become the world’s worst rower and what would you say to yourself in order to become worse each session (rhythm, timing, bladework) Then what would be the world’s most receptive, improving rower.  If I incentivised you enough are you confident you can do all these things to become the worst….?  [they are confident that they can choose behaviours to make a bad outcome].  Then talk about the positive and whether there is any difference between the two.  Commit to doing the change.  Remind them on the water “you are choosing to be rather ineffective right now.  Do you want to carry on making this choice, because I’ll support you fully….”
Working with cricketers – he gets a list of all the negative things they talk to themselves.  Permission to coach them using the same negative phrases while they are facing a batting machine….. this makes them realise that if someone else talks to them in the same way they talk to themselves it isn’t a good thing.
 

David Tanner - the Road to Beijing

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

The Post Athens Perspective
-    Rowing without Pinsent and Redgrave
-    Building on the results from 2004 – 3 medals for women, 1 gold for mens sweep, poor performances from lightweights
Everyone remembers the Olympics results and can ‘forgive’ any failings in the World Championships.


This will be the first Olympics since 1984 when we will be going without either Pinsent or Redgrave on the team.  That year was the breakthrough for GB rowing…. the first gold since 1948.  In 1996 the rowing gold medal was the ONLY one GB won in the whole games.  Our great media profile is in part due to us producing ‘heroes’ for the public eye.  It didn’t use to be like this we got about 3 pieces a year in the newspapers.  Sydney was the first EVER Olympic medal for GB women, a silver in 4x.  


We now have the best womens sculling squad in the world.  We should ‘deliver’ at Beijing. At Athens only one mens crew made a final…. it won the gold.  This is what counts but we need more crews in finals in Beijing.

Finding and developing Olympians
-    The club is where every rower starts
-    The coach is the greatest single influence on a rower
The dilemma for clubs is that you lose the best athletes quite quickly.  E.g. Richard Spratley got Tom Lucie at Brookes and within 18 months he was 3rd at senior trials and taken away to the GB squad programme.  Richard can be proud of this achievement.
-    World Class Start is 5 years old.  2005 the first WCS athletes came to senior trials; 2007 first medals in Olympic classes and U23 had 6 medallists; 2007 starting Sporting Giants initiative started
-    Trying to find athletes from ‘new and different’ places.  There is a shortage of state sector schools, few universities offer high performance.  This complements the ‘traditional’ rowing schools / universities / clubs programme to world class rowing.
-    Sporting giants is for volleyball, basketball and rowing talent ID.

 
The high performance model depends on
-    Good funding
-    Developing coaches
-    Supporting the rower
-    Top logistics
-    Caversham (GB Rowing’s first base)

“I am still a volunteer in my head, of course I do get paid now, but I still think this is my hobby” David Tanner

More people are able to make Rowing coaching a career than ever before.  There is a career pathway here now.  When GB rowing increased coaches from 2.5 when DT started in 1996, there are now over 20.  There was a fear that this would suck all the good club coaches to the ARA leaving nothing in the clubs.  This hasn’t happened.


Logistics – important.  He visited NZ last week and has found only 2/3 hotels that he considers possibly appropriate for the team when the worlds go to Karapiro in 2010.  Advance planning is key.


Caversham funded by Lottery £13m.  Opened in April 2006.  He doesn’t think it is a coincidence that our best ever World Championships were last year.

 
Create new champions

-    GB Women – Golds in sculling and building the sweep squad. Redgrave visits to give advice.
-    Qualified  womens 4x, 2x, 8. Not qualified W2- or W1x
-    GB Men – making a new four, building the sweep squad, sculling into the medal zone
-    Qualified mens 1x, 2x, 2-, 4-, 8.  Not qualified 4x
-    Lightweights – raising the bar.  Outstandingly good work by coaches and athletes
-    Qualified LM2x, 4-, LW2x.

Target is to win 3 medals in Beijing and 3 A finals.  There are 130 qualified Olympians from UK so far and 41 are rowers.

 
The Paralympic Challenge
-    Rowing becomes the only new paralympic sport in 2005
-    Four paralympic boat classes – LTA mixed 4+, LTA mixed 2x, AW 1x, AM 1x
-    Secured UK Sport funding and starting to develop the club pathway
-    Top nation at worlds last year was Brazil, UK second.